Which Camera Nikon 3300 Or 3400

The Nikon D3300 was a remarkably good entry-level camera when it was starting time released in 2014, and remains one of the best DSLR cameras out there for beginners. The Nikon D3400, released a few years afterwards the D3300, is a like, if slightly improved, version of the same machine. Both cameras are easy to use and offer competitive image quality compared to other entry-level devices. The D3300 and the D3400 are both good starting points for anyone looking to endeavor more advanced photography techniques and provide an approachable and affordable footstep upwardly for those currently relying on their smartphone'due south photographic camera.

Just, which is best?

Despite many similarities, the D3300 and D3400 differ on a few points, mainly in regards to compatibility with certain accessories. Depending on your needs and your desire to proceed pursuing photography in the long run, these differences may influence which product y'all cease up ownership. Nosotros'll compare the effectively details below — but rest assured, both photographic camera will exist an excellent and reliable purchase for any newbie out there.

Performance

In many ways, the bones of the Nikon D3300 and D3400 are most identical. Both have a 24.2-megapixel cropped (DX) sensor; continuous shooting at 5 frames per 2nd; and an 11-betoken autofocus system. They also both utilize the Expeed 4 processing engine, a component besides used in the Nikon D5300 and D7200. The D3300 has a built-in panorama mode and sensor cleaning. The D3400 weighs slightly less, however information technology has a longer battery life than its predecessor (1,200 versus 700 shots), but in terms of differences in the actual make-up of the machines, you'd be hard pressed to find many. The weight and battery of the D3400 are nice improvements, but by no means a deal breaker for the D3300.

Winner: Necktie

Display and connectivity

Both cameras have fixed 3-inch monitors (not-touch) with 921k-dot resolutions and menu arrangement, but the 3400 has a few extra playback options. As for connectivity, the D3300 won't exist wirelessly compatible out of the box, but you do have the option of attaching the WU-1a Wireless Adapter. Even so, at $60 for the attachment, it'll likely be cheaper (or at least simpler) to just purchase the D3400, which comes with SnapBridge compatibility correct away. SnapBridge — a feature first introduced with the Nikon D500 — allows the D3400 to connect via Bluetooth to a compatible smart device and transfer images, allowing yous to easily transport or post them to social media.

Since the D3400 relies on Bluetooth and not the faster Wi-Fi, y'all will simply exist able to transfer unedited, smaller-sized images — fine for social media, only not if you plan to make serious edits. SnapBridge volition also allow y'all to use your telephone or tablet as a remote monitor, which is useful.

Winner: D3400

Image quality

Since both cameras are built so similarly, the images they produce will be near identical likewise. Where you'll notice the about differences in image quality (although these will be pocket-sized) is in low-light situations. The D3300 has a native ISO range of 100-12,800, expandable to 25,600 in Hi-ane mode — at the toll of quality. The D3400 has a native range of 100-25,600, without having to expand by that limit. With that said, virtually users shouldn't go above 12,800 anyway, unless they don't mind noise. The D3300 has slightly ameliorate flash range than the D3400 (12m vs. 7m). The 3400 does support newer lenses than the 3300, but it isn't a big advantage. At the terminate of the day, both cameras will produce good pictures under most circumstances.

Winner: Necktie

Video

Despite being the older model, the D3300 is really a scrap better when it comes to recording video. Both cameras tin record Full Hd video 1080/60p with monaural sound. However, what makes the D3300 stand out is the microphone port, which allows you to record better audio quality from an external microphone. While recording from the built-in microphone will get the job done, it'southward less desirable for those more serious about video versus photos (such as vloggers) because the microphone is more prone to pick up operational sounds from the photographic camera itself. That being said, the image quality of the videos will be the aforementioned regardless of which camera you end up with, but the audio may be better on the D3300.

Winner: D3300

Overall winner: D3300

Since the D3300 is a few years older than the D3400, it's likely that you lot'll be able to find information technology for less than the D3400. In virtually cases, the D3400 is going to be almost $100 more than the D3300 for a single-lens kit. There will eventually exist a time when the D3400 will be the only camera in this line available for purchase (since it is newer), but for the fourth dimension being, the D3300 remains a great option for an entry-level camera that's ameliorate for photos and videos. If video isn't your affair and connectivity matters more, you lot'll need to make up one's mind if the D3400 is worth the premium.

For more than information on digital cameras, especially if you are a beginner, make certain to check out our 17 Essential Photography Tips for Beginners. And if you lot're looking for other entry-level DSLR options, bank check out our listing.

Editors' Recommendations

• Best GoPro alternative action photographic camera deals for June 2022
• The best webcams for 2022
• The best 360-degree camera apps for iOS and Android
• Best camera deals for June 2022
• How to choose the best microSD cards for your smartphone or tablet

Source: https://www.digitaltrends.com/photography/nikon-d3300-vs-d3400/

Posted by: macgregorlauto1982.blogspot.com

Share this post